Safe Bayesian Quantile Regression

Authors

  • med Sadeq Shniat Department of Statistics , College of Administration and Economics, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Author
  • Ahmad Naeem Flaih Department of Statistics , College of Administration and Economics, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62933/8ang6p97

Keywords:

Bayesian estimation , learning rate , safe Bayes , posterior distribution , Simulation

Abstract

In Bayesian estimation of the quantile regression parameters become more accurate estimate if the likelihood function equipped with learning rate parameter (safe Bayesian). Learning rate parameter can be se to solve the problem of overfitting of the estimated model. The amount of the data (likelihood) can be controlled by the learning rate parameter which reflects on the good conclusion that drawn.  Bayesian estimation under the likelihood with leaning rate parameter results the so called learning rate generalized posterior. Choosing the appropriate learning rate parameter is the key idea of this paper, simulation study has conducted based on suggesting that the learning rate parameter follows the multinomial distribution. New Gibbs sampler algorithm has developed beside the quantile regression. Real data analysis has done with the response variable that represents the creatinine in the blood along with some predictor variables. Based on the results of simulation study and real data we have conclude that the proposed model is perform well along with other different regression models. 

References

[1] Koenker, R. and G. J. Bassett (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46, 33- 50.

[2] Yu, K. and Moyeed, R. (2001). Bayesian quantile regression. Statistics & Probability Letters, 54:437-447.

[3] Yu, K., Z. Lu, and J. Stander. (2003). Quantile regression: Applications and current research areas. The Statistician 52, 331-350.

[4] Kozumi, H. and G. Kobayashi (2011). Gibbs sampling methods for Bayesian quantile regression. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 81, 1565-1578.

[5] Grünwald, P. D. and Ommen, T.V. (2014). Inconsistency of Bayesian Inference for Misspecified Linear Models, and a Proposal for Repairing It. eprint arXiv: 1412.3730.

[6] Heide, R. de. (2016). the safe-bayesian lasso, master thesis. mathematical institute. Universiteit Leiden.

[7] Alhamzawi, R. (2016). Bayesian elastic net Tobit quantile regression. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 45(7), 2409-2427.

[8] Alkenani A, and Masllam, B.S. (2019). Journal of probability and Statistics, Vol. 2019.Group identification and variably. Selection in quantile regression.

[9] Alhamzawi, R. and K. Yu (2013). Bayesian tobit quantile regression using g- prior distribution with ridge parameter. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, revised manuscript.

[10] Alhamzawi, R. (2013). Tobit quantile regression with the adaptive lasso penalty. In The Fourth International Arab Conference of Statistics, 450 ISSN (1681 - 6870).

[11] Hao, L. & Naiman, D. (2007) Quantile Regression (07-149). Sage Publications.

[12] Yu, K. and J. Zhang (2005). A three-parameter asymmetric Laplace distribution and its extension. Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods 34, 1867-1879.

[13] Li, Y. and J. Zhu (2008). 11-norm quantile regressions. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 17, 163-185.

[14] Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 267-288.

[15] Mzedawee, A. N. H. (2023). Safe Bayesian Inference of Lasso Censored Regression Based on Multinomial Distribution. AL-Qadisiyah Journal for Administrative and Economic sciences. Vol.25. Issue.4.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-11

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Safe Bayesian Quantile Regression. (2025). Iraqi Statisticians Journal, 2(special issue for ICSA2025), 301-311. https://doi.org/10.62933/8ang6p97